The social functions of literature

To a materialist, religion, law, morals and art represent separate aspects of one and the same process of social development.

The Social Roots and the Social Function of Literature

Thus the study of literature qua literature should make us better critical thinkers. Why, then, cannot folk art in certain cases treat the nobleman and the priest together, as the representatives of the classes which stand above the people and which plunder them?

Materialism does not deny the significance of the element of form, either in logic, jurisprudence or art. Yes, on this example, the tiles would serve a practical purpose by protecting the inside partitions or floors of the power from deterioration.

But this continuity is dialectic, that is, it finds itself by means of internal repulsions and breaks. Models for Character Be Patient like the Tortoise: A new class does not begin to create all of culture from the beginning, but enters into possession of the past, assorts it, touches it up, rearranges it, The social functions of literature builds on it further.

Literature, whose methods and processes have their roots far back in the most distant past and represent the accumulated experience of verbal craftsmanship, expresses the thoughts, feelings, moods, points of view and hopes of the new epoch and of its new class.

Each class has its own policy in art, that is, a system of presenting demands on art, which changes with time; for instance, the Maecenas-like protection of court and grand seigneur, the automatic relationship of supply and demand which is supplemented by complex methods of influencing the individual, and so forth, and so on.

Why, then, cannot folk art in certain cases treat the nobleman and the priest together, as the representatives of the classes which stand above the people and which plunder them? Even the ravings of an insane person contain nothing that the sick man had not received before from the outside world.

The Social Function of Literature: 1800–1850

Literature also, and most importantly, strengthens our vision of a world that would make a lot more human sense than the one we live in. No one is going to prescribe themes to a poet or intends to prescribe them.

The first role of literature is simply to create a reference point for discussions. But Marxism alone can explain why and how a given tendency in art has originated in a given period of history; in other words, who it was who made a demand for such an artistic form and not for another, and why.

On the contrary, it must plough the entire field in all directions. You cannot pass this by, nor escape its force Against the backdrop of Russian social history in the early nineteenth century, the author describes the dissemination of new aesthetic norms, notably the relations of the Russian literary elite to "lowbrow" and "middlebrow" groups.

And from the point of view of the question that interests us here, it makes absolutely no difference whether these homogeneous themes arose independently among different peoples, as the reflection of a life experience which was homogeneous in its fundamental traits and which was reflected through the homogeneous prism of a peasant imagination, or whether the seeds of these fairy tales were carried by a favourable wind from place to place, striking root wherever the ground turned out to be favourable.

The Social Roots and the Social Function of Literature

Though they differ among themselves regarding the other functions of literature, they are all agreed on one point—that the main function of literature is to entertain the readers, or, in other words, to give them pleasure.

That is why the intelligentsia not only did not conceal art with a tendency, but proclaimed it, thus sacrificing art, just as it sacrificed many other things. On the contrary, it emphasises the all-determining significance of natural and economic conditions in the formation of folklore.

It is not easy to understand why Marxism should be supposed to condemn themes to a condition of serfdom. It would be childish to think that every class can entirely and fully create its own art from within itself, and, particularly, that the proletariat is capable of creating a new art by means of closed art guilds or circles, or by the Organisation for Proletarian Culture, etc.

It is very likely that, in reality, these methods were combined. The idealist, on the other hand, does not see a unified process of historic development which evolves the necessary organs and functions from within itself, but a crossing or combining and interacting of certain independent principles-the religious, political, juridical, aesthetic and ethical substances, which find their origin and explanation in themselves.

The architectural scheme of the Cologne cathedral can be established by measuring the base and the height of its arches, by determining the three dimensions of its naves, the dimensions and the placement of the columns, etc. It is not done by logical deduction, but by empirical measurement and by adjustment to the economic needs of the new ruling class.

He asserted that the aim of the writer is, not to teach, but to please, and he distinguished between literature which is art and literature which is didactic. True, the formalists of law and morals did not go so far as to assert the complete independence of law and ethics from economics.

The formalists show a fast ripening religiousness. This massive graphic novel tells a story of religious conflict, child brides, harems, devouring poverty, what love really is, and — most importantly — storytelling itself.

But this continuity is dialectic, that is, it finds itself by means of internal repulsions and breaks.

The Functions of Literature

Or is it important that we try to step back and look at things more coolly in such situations? On the contrary, it emphasises the all-determining significance of natural and economic conditions in the formation of folklore.A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories.

A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or.

Functions Of Literature

The first role of literature is simply to create a reference point for discussions. We obviously have lots of other things to debate, discuss, and muse over like, political. The first role of literature is simply to create a reference point for discussions.

We obviously have lots of other things to debate, discuss, and muse over like, political figures, current events, friends, family, and so on. Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more.

Get started now! Found 11 sentences matching phrase "Social function of literature".Found in 17 ms.

The Social Function of Literature

Translation memories are created by human, but computer aligned, which might cause mistakes. They come from many sources and are not checked. Literature, whose methods and processes have their roots far back in the most distant past and represent the accumulated experience of verbal craftsmanship, expresses the thoughts, feelings, moods, points of view and hopes of .

Download
The social functions of literature
Rated 3/5 based on 17 review